Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
  Advanced
Register  |  Log in  
   Ask    
 Answer  
  Help  

Ask QuestionsprogressAnswer QuestionsprogressBuild ReputationprogressBecome an Expert
 
Free Answers in 3 Easy Steps

Register Now
3 Steps

At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you will be able to:
  • Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+ topics.
  • Accept money for answers that you provide.
  • Communicate privately with other members (PM).
  • See fewer ads.

Home > Science > Astronomy   »   Shadow Calculation

 
Question Tools Search this Question Display Modes
Question
 
 
#1  
Old Feb 10, 2008, 11:16 PM
Uma Maheswari
New Member
Uma Maheswari is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1
Uma Maheswari See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Shadow Calculation

hi..
Can anyone able to give me answer for this question..
how to show the shadow of an object for(e.g.Buildings) when the position of sun and geographical position of building is known?
Also say me in which direction the shadow will fall and what will be the length of the shadow?
Is their any formula to calculate the length,angle,direction of the shadow fall according to sun position or time?

Reply With Quote
 
     

Answers
 
 
Old Feb 11, 2008, 04:00 AM   #2  
Capuchin
Science Expert
Capuchin is online now
 
Capuchin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 4,582
Capuchin See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Capuchin See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Capuchin See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Capuchin See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Capuchin See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Capuchin See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Call Capuchin via Skype™ Send a message via MSN to Capuchin
It's fairly simple, just draw rays of light from the sun to the verticies of the building and project them onto the ground.

You should be able to see that the rays of light form triangle which you can easily use to find what you are looking for if you know, say, the height of the building and the elevation of the sun. It's all simple trigonometry.

If you still are confused, you'll need to give a little more information on what you're looking for.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Feb 12, 2008, 02:29 PM   #3  
Stratmando
Ultra Member
Stratmando is offline
 
Stratmando's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Florida Keys
Posts: 3,668
Stratmando See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Stratmando See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
If you held up a 10' pole and it cast a 20' shadow, then if you measure the shadow of a building(both on flat ground, A Slope would complicate right now),
Then if you measure a building's shadow and it is a 100' shadow, the building is 50' Tall.
A shadow will move from West to east, as the sun does the opposite.
If I was trying to find height of building, and no shadow, I think I would walk any direction from building with a clinometer or anything that will show 45 Degrees and walk with the bottom level til the angle of the 45 points at the top of the building. The distance from the building will be equal to the Height.
Like Capuchun says, other info you provide can help.
Also the sun angle changes as you go from equinox(Equal day/equal night) to solstice, to equinox, to solstice and back to equinox completing 1 year.
Almost forgot, the sun moves at 15 Degrees per hour.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Mar 24, 2008, 08:03 AM   #4  
Credendovidis
Ultra Member
Credendovidis is offline
 
Credendovidis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: EU
Posts: 1,046
Credendovidis See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stratmando
... Almost forgot, the sun moves at 15 Degrees per hour.
That even was so in the early stages of the solar system, when a day was much shorter than it is today ... And as it will be in the future when a day will be much longer than it is today. All it takes is being flexible with what a second is ...
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Mar 24, 2008, 08:14 AM   #5  
Capuchin
Science Expert
Capuchin is online now
 
Capuchin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 4,582
Capuchin See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Capuchin See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Capuchin See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Capuchin See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Capuchin See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Capuchin See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Call Capuchin via Skype™ Send a message via MSN to Capuchin
Quote:
Originally Posted by Credendovidis
That even was so in the early stages of the solar system, when a day was much shorter than it is today ... And as it will be in the future when a day will be much longer than it is today. All it takes is being flexible with what a second is ...

How can you be flexible with a second? A second is the amount of time it takes light to travel 299792458 meters in a vacuum.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Mar 24, 2008, 08:35 AM   #6  
Credendovidis
Ultra Member
Credendovidis is offline
 
Credendovidis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: EU
Posts: 1,046
Credendovidis See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Capuchin
How can you be flexible with a second? A second is the amount of time it takes light to travel 299792458 meters in a vacuum.
I clearly referred to Stratmando's "the sun moves at 15 Degrees per hour".
That value you provided is based on the specification of a second we use today.
However we also call one rev. of earth (i.e. 360 degrees) 24 hours.
4 Billion years ago "24 hours" on earth took less than 18 of our current hours.
In about 1 Billion years - based on the "breaking" influence caused by the expanding orbit of our moon - "24 hours" on earth will take around 26 of our current hours.
A second / minute / hour is indeed flexible. On long term that is.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Mar 24, 2008, 08:43 AM   #7  
Capuchin
Science Expert
Capuchin is online now
 
Capuchin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 4,582
Capuchin See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Capuchin See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Capuchin See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Capuchin See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Capuchin See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Capuchin See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Call Capuchin via Skype™ Send a message via MSN to Capuchin
Quote:
Originally Posted by Credendovidis
I clearly referred to Stratmando's "the sun moves at 15 Degrees per hour".
That value you provided is based on the specification of a second we use today.
However we also call one rev. of earth (i.e. 360 degrees) 24 hours.
4 Billion years ago "24 hours" on earth took less than 18 of our current hours.
In about 1 Billion years - based on the "breaking" influence caused by the expanding orbit of our moon - "24 hours" on earth will take around 26 of our current hours.
A second / minute / hour is indeed flexible. On long term that is.
I understand what you are saying, but a second is not defined by how fast the Earth spins, so I don't see how it's relevant.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Mar 24, 2008, 09:09 AM   #8  
Credendovidis
Ultra Member
Credendovidis is offline
 
Credendovidis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: EU
Posts: 1,046
Credendovidis See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Capuchin
I understand what you are saying, but a second is not defined by how fast the Earth spins, so I don't see how it's relevant.
So you suggest that in the far future a day/night will take anything else than 24 hours?
Get real !!! Over time humanity - if not becoming extinct - will change the value of hours and seconds to suit their purpose. Already now we are fiddling with the "year" to suit our need ...
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Mar 24, 2008, 09:18 AM   #9  
Capuchin
Science Expert
Capuchin is online now
 
Capuchin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 4,582
Capuchin See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Capuchin See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Capuchin See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Capuchin See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Capuchin See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Capuchin See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Call Capuchin via Skype™ Send a message via MSN to Capuchin
Quote:
Originally Posted by Credendovidis
So you suggest that in the far future a day/night will take anything else than 24 hours?
Get real !!! Over time humanity - if not becoming extinct - will change the value of hours and seconds to suit their purpose. Already now we are fiddling with the "year" to suit our need ...
I think it's more likely that the definition of second will stay the same, and we will just have leap seconds or leap minutes, if we don't revamp the whole time thing, 24 hours is a silly number to have anyways. But I doubt they will change how a second is defined, as that will change our definition of the speed of light.

Comments on this post
Stratmando agrees: With Satellites dependant on the breakdown of a Second, Second will likely remain the same, then leap seconds, etc
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Mar 24, 2008, 09:38 AM   #10  
Credendovidis
Ultra Member
Credendovidis is offline
 
Credendovidis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: EU
Posts: 1,046
Credendovidis See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Capuchin
But I doubt they will change how a second is defined, as that will change our definition of the speed of light.
You may be good in science, but I fear you are poor in forecasting human behaviour!
Please note that essentially we both agree on the standard of lightspeed, but we differ on validating human nature ...
  Reply With Quote
 
     


Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

 
Similar Sponsors

Similar Questions
Question Asker Topic Answers Last Post
seeing a shadow and a ghost NRR22 Paranormal Phenomena 8 Dec 14, 2007 04:18 PM
tmobile shadow? soccerstarxx Cell Phones 1 Nov 19, 2007 03:31 PM
Creative Eye Shadow ChihuahuaMomma Beauty 4 Oct 29, 2007 11:09 PM
Shaving and shadow hypaboyracer Beauty 1 Oct 8, 2007 01:37 AM
shadow people panchan114 Paranormal Phenomena 19 Apr 17, 2007 09:47 AM




Copyright ©2003 - 2007, Ask Me Help Desk.
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:11 AM.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6 © 2006, Crawlability, Inc.