Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
  Advanced
Register  |  Log in  
   Ask    
 Answer  
  Help  

Ask QuestionsprogressAnswer QuestionsprogressBuild ReputationprogressBecome an Expert
 
Free Answers in 3 Easy Steps

Register Now
3 Steps

At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you will be able to:
  • Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+ topics.
  • Accept money for answers that you provide.
  • Communicate privately with other members (PM).
  • See fewer ads.

Home > Arts & Leisure > Architecture   »   Twin Tower Question

 
Question Tools Search this Question Display Modes
Question
 
 
#1  
Old Sep 25, 2006, 09:37 PM
Starman
-
Starman is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 1,352
Starman See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Starman See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Twin Tower Question

If the architects were aware of the design's susceptibility to heat why didn't any of them make a quick call to inform those who were in danger of the buildings collapsing on them?

Reply With Quote
 
     

Answers
 
 
Old Sep 26, 2006, 12:20 AM   #2  
Fr_Chuck
Christianity Expert
Fr_Chuck is offline
 
Fr_Chuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 23,685
Fr_Chuck has disabled reputation
The metal had a heat protection coating, but it was blow off by the crash on the several floors with the direct hit ( from my understanding)

And of course they did know before the towers fell that they were in danger, from the police helecopter who said it appeared to be weakening, and of course when the first fell to the time the second one fell

What happened was that first of course the elevators were not working, so everyone was on the stairs, firemen going up, people trying to come down.

The fire radios could not reach the firemen futher up in the buildings, so they had no way to talk to each other. The police radios could not talk to the firemen. So while they tried to get the warning out, by the time they got to some of them it was too late for them to get out.

( an over simiple version)

They had approved new radios that would allow fire and police to talk to each other a year eariler, but the police chief and fire chief could not agree on who was to be in control of them, and the radios were never used. *** side note, and to this day they still have not agreed and the radios are still not in use.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Sep 26, 2006, 01:28 AM   #3  
colbtech
Senior Member
colbtech is offline
 
colbtech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Guernsey
Posts: 588
colbtech See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
I don't think you can design a structure that caters for every eventuality. After all, when designing a product, your first concern is for the safety of who or what may be inside.
Fire is one of the hazards taken into account and there are the building regs that state (among other things) that you cannot build a structure that does not have any hazard protection.
I have yet to see or hear of a set of building regs that state the structure must be safe against a plane flying into it. You may as well write building regs that state the structure must be bomb proof!

It was a sad day, not only for those that lost their lives but for the whole world, muslims included. This has coloured the western view of the muslim religion and the people that follow Islam.

It is strange that considering all religions (well the ones that I know of) teach peace and yet throughout history more people have died because of ones God being better than other. Even as an atheist I cannot undertsand such a senseless act.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Sep 26, 2006, 03:30 AM   #4  
NeedKarma
Ultra Member
NeedKarma is offline
 
NeedKarma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,790
NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
I believe that the structures, as the Empire State building demonstrated, can withstand the impact of a small plane. I'm not sure any building could withstand a wide-body jet fully laden with fuel crashing into it a very high velocity. That risk mitigation probably did not occur to them during design in the early 70's.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Oct 11, 2006, 09:47 PM   #5  
javedahmad
New Member
javedahmad is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3
javedahmad See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
For more information on what really happened on 9-11 please visit http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Oct 12, 2006, 12:46 AM   #6  
Krs
Ultra Member
Krs is offline
 
Krs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Island on the Mediterrean Sea
Posts: 2,705
Krs See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Krs See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Krs See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Krs See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Well everybody has different views on what really happened...
No website or story may change some peoples minds.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Oct 15, 2006, 09:10 PM   #7  
Starman
-
Starman is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 1,352
Starman See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Starman See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by colbtech
I don't think you can design a structure that caters for every eventuality. After all, when designing a product, your first concern is for the safety of who or what may be inside.
Fire is one of the hazards taken into account and there are the building regs that state (among other things) that you cannot build a structure that does not have any hazard protection.
I have yet to see or hear of a set of building regs that state the structure must be safe against a plane flying into it. You may as well write building regs that state the structure must be bomb proof!

It was a sad day, not only for those that lost their lives but for the whole world, muslims included. This has coloured the western view of the muslim religion and the people that follow Islam.

It is strange that considering all religions (well the ones that I know of) teach peace and yet throughout history more people have died because of ones God being better than other. Even as an atheist I cannot undertsand such a senseless act.

I do agree with you on the inability to prepare a structure for all eventualities. That would mean conceivably preparing it for a direct hit by an asteroid-right? No, what my question entails is within the realm of the possible. I design a building, see that it's being subjected to temperatures which might cause its imediate collapse, make a quick phone call or else go personally to the site if it is possible, and dutifully inform the authorities that those inside are in grave danger due to imminent building collapse.

That is all I am asking about.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Nov 26, 2006, 07:11 PM   #8  
DwightB
New Member
DwightB is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 15
DwightB See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
The structural members had fire protection that was sprayed on and rated for 4 hours of protection, which would have allowed the building to completely empty safely under foreseeable conditions. What was NOT foreseeable, was that the impact would blast off the spray-on fire protection (a product that has been used successfully in thousands of installations) and expose the steel to burning jet fuel thus drastically reducing the time required to soften the structure. At the same time, the impact made elevator inoperable and blocked exit stairs for all above the floors of impact, eliminating their only route of escape other than windows.
  Reply With Quote
 
     


Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

 
Similar Sponsors

Similar Questions
Question Asker Topic Answers Last Post
cd drive in g4 tower jstebbins Apple & Macintosh 2 May 3, 2007 06:25 AM
The Old Tower Susan Orlando Art 0 Aug 20, 2006 08:08 AM
Tower Fans ScottGem Heating & Air Conditioning 2 May 11, 2006 02:20 PM
Tower-Smoking disphf Desktops 3 Jan 28, 2006 07:29 AM
time tower on xp won't boot kamperkarper Computers for Beginners 3 May 29, 2005 08:14 AM




Copyright ©2003 - 2007, Ask Me Help Desk.
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:00 AM.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6 © 2006, Crawlability, Inc.