Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
 

Free Answers in 3 Easy Steps

Register Now
3 Steps
 


Ask QuestionsprogressAnswer QuestionsprogressBuild ReputationprogressBecome an Expert
 
At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you will be able to:
  • Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+ topics.
  • Accept money for answers that you provide.
  • Communicate privately with other members (PM).
  • See fewer ads.
  View Answers    Answer this question    Ask a question  
 

pslflcb
Jun 18, 2012, 11:21 AM
I was hired as a salaried employee, based on 40 hrs per week; no contract signed, just a verbal agreement. During July and Aug this year I'm being cut to 20 hrs per week at an hourly pay rate of $6.00 per hr less than my "salary" rate. Then in Sept I'm being bumped back up to 40 hrs per week, at the salary rate. However during 6 months of the year, when I'm on "salary", I actually work 43 hrs per week, but my check only shows payment based on 40 hrs. Can an employer legally do this sort of thing?

JudyKayTee
Jun 18, 2012, 12:37 PM
Where? Union or contract?

ballengerb1
Jun 18, 2012, 12:49 PM
Is your lunch and break part of that 43 hours?

AK lawyer
Jun 18, 2012, 05:53 PM
... Union or contract?

I believe OP answered that question before you asked it: "no contract signed, just a verbal agreement."

Unless the verbal agreement had some sort of tenure provision ("I won't lay you off without good cause" or "if I have to lay you off or reduce your hours, I will give you a severance package", I don't believe OP has much of a case. The employer could just let OP go, and then, if he or she chose, re-hire him/her at the reduced hours per week and reduced wage rate.

JudyKayTee
Jun 18, 2012, 07:43 PM
I believe OP answered that question before you asked it: "no contract signed, just a verbal agreement."

Unless the verbal agreement had some sort of tenure provision ("I won't lay you off without good cause" or "if I have to lay you off or reduce your hours, I will give you a severance package", I don't believe OP has much of a case. The employer could just let OP go, and then, if he or she chose, re-hire him/her at the reduced hours per week and reduced wage rate.

- And so he did.