Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
 

Free Answers in 3 Easy Steps

Register Now
3 Steps
 


Ask QuestionsprogressAnswer QuestionsprogressBuild ReputationprogressBecome an Expert
 
At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you will be able to:
  • Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+ topics.
  • Accept money for answers that you provide.
  • Communicate privately with other members (PM).
  • See fewer ads.
  View Answers    Answer this question    Ask a question  
 

sjbsawyer
Dec 20, 2009, 02:28 PM
Per Myhrvold's idea (Fareed Zakaria, CNN) for solving global warming, adding a certain volume of sulfur dioxide mist at a certain rate to the outer atmosphere will help to reflect sunlight by 1 degree, which will "check" the amount of carbon dioxide which is responsible for what is believed to be global warming. My question is what would be the chemical fallout of such an endeavor, and will it cause more harm to the planet than it will do good?

Perito
Dec 20, 2009, 03:39 PM
Sulfur dioxide in the atmosphere will absorb water to form sulfurous acid. The sulfur dioxide can be oxidized at higher atmospheric levels to sulfur trioxide, SO3. That will absorb water to form sulfuric acid. Both of those acids would contribute to "acid rain" which kills plants, corrodes anything metal, etc.