Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
 

Free Answers in 3 Easy Steps

Register Now
3 Steps
 


Ask QuestionsprogressAnswer QuestionsprogressBuild ReputationprogressBecome an Expert
 
At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you will be able to:
  • Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+ topics.
  • Accept money for answers that you provide.
  • Communicate privately with other members (PM).
  • See fewer ads.
  Answer this Question    Ask about Taxes    Ask about another Subject  
 

MonteC
Nov 5, 2009, 11:12 AM
A friend was a W-2 employee in NYC until 6 weeks ago - He's now receiving unemployment. He'll soon be licensed and "working" as a real estate agent in NYC, earning as an independent contractor. Is it possible for him to remain "invisible" until the first commission check (which may not come for 2-3 months)? He plans to be actively and vigorously seeking work and be fully able and available to accept offers to work while pursuing this RE "hobby".
Does the only record of employment come through records of payment through 1099? Are these records specifically dated or do they simply record the year? Does the RE broker report start date to the IRS, or does that information surface only in the event of audit?

Yes, he understands about possible fraud, repayment and penalties. The questions above are quite specific. Thank you!

twinkiedooter
Nov 5, 2009, 11:55 AM
If your friend decides to do this "fraud" pursing his hobby, he will have to not only repay the UE benefits, but will have to pay a hefty fine and could possibly land in jail. Each week that he says to the folks at UE that he was not employed or self employed is considered one count of fraud. Quite possibly he could end up with 16 counts of fraud if he doesn't get a commission check. Have him chew on the 16 counts of fraud.

AtlantaTaxExpert
Nov 6, 2009, 08:43 AM
Twinkledooter's points are well taken, but this is REALLY a LAW question, NOT a tax question.