Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
 

Free Answers in 3 Easy Steps

Register Now
3 Steps
 


Ask QuestionsprogressAnswer QuestionsprogressBuild ReputationprogressBecome an Expert
 
At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you will be able to:
  • Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+ topics.
  • Accept money for answers that you provide.
  • Communicate privately with other members (PM).
  • See fewer ads.
  Answer this Question    Ask about Finance & Accounting    Ask about another Subject  
 

alterescu
Sep 20, 2009, 08:02 AM
company A Industry

Return on Sales 2% 10%
Return on assets 18% 12%


Explain why the return on assets is more ratio is more favorable the return on sale ratio compare to the industry.

How to calculate

ArcSine
Sep 20, 2009, 10:01 AM
Return on Sales, and Return on Assets, are, respectively...

ROS = \frac{\text{Net Income}}{\text{Sales}}

ROA = \frac{\text{Net Income}}{\text{Sales}} .

Looking at those two ratios, think about what situations might cause a company's ROA to be significantly higher than its ROS. Give that some thought, and post back if you're stuck.

alterescu
Sep 20, 2009, 12:30 PM
ROA should be Net Income / Equity am i right

so seems to me that if you can get more money per assets dollar you are in a good situation

ArcSine
Sep 20, 2009, 03:19 PM
Wow, I booted that one, didn't I? (That's what happens when I try to type and watch the football game at the same time :o) Very sorry, Alterescu. ROA is

\frac{\text{Net Income}}{\text{Total Assets}} .

There...much better.

Now on to the subject of the question. Your thinking is on track--ROA is an indication of how many dollars of net profit you're generating per dollar of assets employed. All other things constant, increasing your ROA is certainly a positive move.

But I think the question is asking for some possible reasons why a company's ROA might be favorable vis-a-vis its industry average, while its ROS is significantly lagging its peers.

For example, here's one possibility: A company that's significantly less capital-intensive (fewer long-term assets), but more labor-intensive (higher current expenses in its cost structure) than the industry average might exhibit such ROA and ROS stats as those in your problem.

Or for a different twist: Company A's assets might predominantly be a lot of antiquated, fully depreciated plant and equipment (badly in need of upgrades and replacements). The fact that they're fully depreciated would tend to push the company's ROA metric northward (and also an illustration of why you gotta look under ROA's hood and see what's driving the numbers, and not just take it at face value).

Just a couple of thoughts you can run with. Good luck with your project!

alterescu
Sep 20, 2009, 06:12 PM
thanks
And yes it's not easy doing at the time, as a man i know

morgaine300
Sep 20, 2009, 09:04 PM
Hate to tell you this, but not all men watch football, so no they don't all know.

I'm female and I used to try to do homework while watching football too! So there! (Actually, that was the year I stopped watching and lost track of everything cause I just didn't have that kind of time to spare.)