Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
 

Free Answers in 3 Easy Steps

Register Now
3 Steps
 


Ask QuestionsprogressAnswer QuestionsprogressBuild ReputationprogressBecome an Expert
 
At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you will be able to:
  • Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+ topics.
  • Accept money for answers that you provide.
  • Communicate privately with other members (PM).
  • See fewer ads.
  Answer this Question    Ask about Finance & Accounting    Ask about another Subject  
 

Dead passion
Mar 4, 2009, 12:01 AM
Hello! How are you?

I've solved a question but I am not sure about the answer...

What I want to know is that:

Should we add the materials used in adjusting the machine to produce a satisfactory product, to the cost of plant asset? Knowing that adjesment are normal for this machine and are not are the result of the damages.

I think we shouldn't add it ... Am I right?

Thank you!

ROLCAM
Mar 4, 2009, 12:53 AM
To be meaningful the plant assets should
not be at cost.
Plant assets and their corresponding
provision for depreciations should be valued
based on THE ESTIMATED REPLACEMENT VALUE THEORY.
I would therefore opt for the inclusion of
CAPIALISING the expense.
Professor Ray Chambers of Sydney, Australia has written at length on this subject.
See also The PHILIPS (Holland) GROUP.
They have been using this system for the last
hundred years.

BOLD STATEMENT :-

No balance sheet is worth the paper it is printed on unless the cost basis system is
relinquished.

rolcam.