Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
 

Free Answers in 3 Easy Steps

Register Now
3 Steps
 


Ask QuestionsprogressAnswer QuestionsprogressBuild ReputationprogressBecome an Expert
 
At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you will be able to:
  • Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+ topics.
  • Accept money for answers that you provide.
  • Communicate privately with other members (PM).
  • See fewer ads.
  Answer this Question    Ask about Finance & Accounting    Ask about another Subject  
 

westernnv
Sep 19, 2008, 09:39 AM
Tahoe Gaming is a casino corporation which intends to develop a casino property at Lake Tahoe on leased land. The terms of this transaction are as follows;

Lease term 25 years renewable for a further 25 years at the option of the lessee.

Initial 25 year rental: $2.5 million per year plus 10% of the net gaming win from the casino each year. Current projections place this net win at approximately $50 million per year.

Future option to renew for 25 years: $5 million per year plus an increase based on the increase in the property values in the Lake Tahoe area. Plus 5% of the net win per year. This is not considered to be a bargain renewal option at this date.

Fair market value of the land is estimated to be about $80 million if such land were generally available for casino construction (which it is not).

At the end of the lease any building and infrastructure revert without cost to the lessor.

Tahoe Gaming will build the casino and the surrounding infrastructure at a cost of $100 million. It is presumed that the building would last approximately 50 years. At the mid point of its life assume that its fair value would be about 40% of the cost value. Tahoe Gaming uses straight line depreciation for fixed assets.

Current interest rates for borrowing are about 8% for this company.

REQUIRED

Discuss how Tahoe Gaming should account for the assets and obligations discussed above.


Lease 2 (Do not consider this part for Lease 1 above. It was not known about at the inception of the lease.)

25 years have passed and things did not go quite as well for Tahoe Gaming as it thought and so it has taken a commercial decision not to exercise its option to renew the lease.

Another gaming enterprise, South Shore Slots has decided it will enter into a lease for both the land and buildings for the next 25 years. The terms of this lease are as follows:

Lease term 25 years not renewable.

Down payment at inception $10 million.

Initial rental $5 million per year plus 5% of the net gaming win from the casino each year. Current projections place this net win at approximately $30 million per year.

Fair market value of the land is estimated to be about $80 million if such land were generally available for casino construction (which it is not). The fair market value of the building was appraised to be about $40 million. South Shore will be responsible for demolishing the building at the end of the lease term and restoring the land to its virgin state. Estimated costs of this process are:

Demolition costs $5 million
Environmental clean up and landscaping $5 million

Current interest rates are approximately 8%

Assume that South Shore Slots also uses straight line depreciation or amortization as appropriate...

REQUIRED

Discuss how South Shore Slots should account for the assets and obligations discussed above.

DozerOp3
Sep 21, 2008, 04:20 PM
I dont think Dr. Carslaw would be too happy if he found this...and don't think he won't find this. Do your homework like the rest of us!