This may spur some debate or it may just die away unnoticed... either way, here it is:

Are all women bi-sexual (if not homosexual)? Or in other words, is there such a thing as a "purely heterosexual woman?"

Here are a few things to stir the pot a bit:

In nature, everything has either a positive (+) or a negative (-) energy. Naturally, these things are meant to be drawn to eachother. In such, men are designed to be ATTRACTED (+), while women are designed to be ATTRACTIVE (-). So, in this sense, wouldnt it be that, since all women have this attractive energy, that women would also be attracted to them?

In society, it is acceptable/natural for young girls to hold hands, hug, even bathe or shower together. However, the rules change for young boys. Why is that?

It is also acceptable for older women to kiss one another; however, once again, the rules with men.

The statistics on how many women are either bisexual or homosexual BLOW the numbers for men out of the water.

....just a couple things to spark the conversation.

letmetellu

In your statement you say "In nature, everything has either a positive (+) or a negative (-) energy. Naturally, these things are meant to be drawn to eachother. In such, men are designed to be ATTRACTED (+), while women are designed to be ATTRACTIVE (-). So, in this sense, wouldnt it be that, since all women have this attractive energy, that women would also be attracted to them? Why would the negatives be attracted to the negatives any more that the positives be attracted to the postives.

Then is the rest of you statement you say that little girls hold hands, hug and even bathe together, and males don't. It is my opinion that society has forced males to be of a competative nature and holding hands and hugging is not a way to show competiveness, therefore we are forced to show a harsher and more agressive nature.

Fr_Chuck

"women" you are acting like women are like a atom, all alike, Thank heavens they are not. Desires differ from person to person, and culture to culture.

Man and women are different in many ways. You are refering basicly that women are more emotional or at least appear in American society.

But it is the difference not the simularity that draws men and women together.

We could argure all day as to how and way homosexual behavior or bi-sexual behavior happens, but in so many ways what you are refering is more that of closeness because of sharing that emotional experiences.

As far as older women "kissing" the non sexual contact. In other cultures men would kiss another man on the check ( Jesus did) it was thier culturial way of doing things. A custom that perhaps should not have been lost in our society. Meet one another with a kiss.

talaniman

Hey doc,where do you come up with the stuff you post? Wait on second thought never mind!

Ademan

Well, to say that women aren't attractive to men, is just dead wrong. You can cause women to be completely and hopelessly attracted to you and willing to be at your beck and command (just the way some of us (guys) get when we really like a girl (see: attracted to) ) Yes because of how our society has evolved, the average girl is much more likely to be attractive than the average guy, because the average girl, average looking, could approach most any guy and he'd be honored to be in her company (this is because of either social conditioning or true genetic differences, but men tend to be "hornier" or more openly so). Wheras a man is disadvantaged in that he can't in theory walk away and get another girl if his current interest rejects him.

OF COURSE: This paradigm can be reversed, as we all have seen with jocks, and those fat dudes that are inexplicably popular with the ladies. I've been fairly successful with girls, but I'm by no means a master, but as everyone and their dog will tell you, its about attitude, and i think its that attitude of "i don't need you, there are plenty more like you" that makes women "attractive" (pursued, rather than the pursuers)

eh, sounds like a self help document, and it kinda rambles, hope someone can make some sense of it, its kidna going off on a tangent too, my apologies

cheers
-Dan

bizygurl

Well I think its more or less the standards that society puts on males and females. Society looks at girls from a very young age as caring and nituring, loving, in turn which is drilled in there head to be attractive to the opposite sex. Just look at the toys they have on the market today for girls. Its all about fashion and makeup. Girls are taught they have to be attractive from a very young age.
Since young girls are taught to "play nice and be loving" when they get older or even as children, kiss, hold hands with another girl, its more accepted because of what we were taught as young girls. And since it is so widely accepted in our culture, woman can get away with being more affectionate to members of there own gender and no one bats an eye.
I think the reasons why statistics show that there are more woman then men homosexuals and bisexuals, is the main point that its more accepted. More woman can expirement with there sexuality out in the open. I think maybe woman aren't as apprehensive about this as men are.

And of course boys are taught from a young age. To be dominant and aggressive, nothing is emphasised to them about being nuturing and loving, so thats why Men don't express their bi-sexual or homosexual tendacies because in the eyes of society it makes them "less of a man"

To answer your question about there being a purely heterosexual woman. At least coming from my expirence. I think some woman may wonder what its like being with another woman doesn't necessarily mean that they are attracted to them, but its just the mystery of something that is different and a different expirence. I myself aren't attracted to woman. A woman just could not give me what a man can. Love my guys! Have I wondered what the big deal was with being with another woman? yes. Have i wondered what it would be like as apposed to being with a man, yes. But its not my burning desire to find out. I think you can be curious without being labeled as bi-sexual.
Sorry this speal was a bit long, hope this sheds some light.

augustknight

The 'purpose' of a female is to bear children. Babies require much care and part of that care is giving affection. As is often the case in the animal world a substitute can be 'mothered'. My female cat grooms my male dog. I doubt she likes him all that much but she has an instinct to touch, nuture and display caring. So when women kiss, touch and show affection it is their nature.
To take that one step further into sexuality is misguided. I truely believe that is a porn industry driven concept. The reason you don't see that much male homosexual porn is that straight men don't pay to see that. And the porn industry is marketed to straight males.

lilfyre

No long answer her, I like me, I love my husband, and with all the bad relationships I have been in, I still like men, no women for me. o wait I have always been that way.

DrJ

In chemistry we learn that bonds are formed in one of two ways: electrovalent ( a bond formed between a positive and a negative ions) and covalent (a bond formed between two electrons, which we know electorns are negatively charged). Bonds do not form between two positvley charged forces. Thats where I came up with that lol

DrJ

I am comparing them to atoms. In the argument that the atom is the fundament of everything in the universe, all on a different scale.

How can we say that we dont act the same as atoms? The entire workld is made up of them? Sure, people differ... but not all THAT much. Humans are very predictable to the trained "chemist."

You are right.... it IS the differences, not the simularies, that draw MEN and WOMEN together...

Very true... but where is the closeness line drawn? Is it preposterous to assume that a woman may show thier closenss by bedding with another woman?

Excellent point.... I had thought that when writing what I was... but passed it off. Figured I would bring it up unless someone else does. Ya know, simle devil's advocacy lol