Spraying female orgasm

The answer is short : yes that is possible.
It's due to contractions of - and the resulting force on the available fluids inside - the vagina.

Squirting...is possible.

However, in most porn videos, when a woman squirts and it hits the ceiling for long periods of time...that would be peeing.

Yes it is possible.

The female produces prostatic like fluids, similar to a man. Some believe some women have greater volume in part due to... Ungh, I can't think of the name physically... The fluid passes though tissue with pores or small holes, and the bigger the "holes" that are naturally present, the more volume there is.

That said, there's large suspicion that with larger volumes and stronger streams, urine comes into play.

Another note... In one study of women who were able to control the event versus women who couldn't control it... There was a high proportion of women among those who could control it that didn't feel any additional orgasmic pleasure from the event... Meaning they could train their body to do this at orgasm, but didn't feel a stronger orgasm. Among the women who had no control, they had no reference... Orgasm resulted in ejaculation. Also, women who could contol it often had bigger volumes.

Im not going to say female ejaculation doesn't add additional stimulation is all women. That was just one study and the general results.

But compare that to the male. While orgasm and ejaculation are actually two different events that are tied in time usually, the physical feeling of ejaculation adds strongly to the orgasm. Restricting the shaft of the penis to minimize ejaculation alters the sensation (not that it still isn't intense).

*It is all fake.* Why, I once saw in a film an Asian woman smoking a cigarette with her vagina. In addition, I read about an Indian swami who could put his penis in a dish of water and suck up the solution!

Pornography is acting and make believe. A few men and women can train themselves to do a lot of things with their orifices that the average person cannot do, or train themselves to do. I read an article about how porn actresses *fake* this so called vaginal squirting of copious amounts of fluid. That is what it is *pure fakery*!

Women don't ejaculate....that is an urban myth kept alive by all kinds of misinformation. A woman can train herself to expel urine from her urethra, urine plus other chemicals from semi-dormant glands surrounding her urethra......that's an esoteric kind of skill, but it's not ejaculation by any stretch of the imagination!

Females have a much more sophisticated and complicated genital system compared to men. These kinds of sexual myths spring up because people have little understanding of how the female genital system works, specially the fabulous female multi-orgasmic capacity that men cannot duplicate.

No more posts on female ejaculation without sources.

Period.

The debate goes both ways, and I have yet to see ONE person post a source.

I'll include myself in this--personal experience doesn't count as a source. I want scientific studies, and I want them from reputable sources.

If you can't include it, then I will delete your post. I'm not going to moderate the debate back and forth yet AGAIN when this has been talked about in at LEAST 2 other threads in the last month.

Do not close this thread yet.

I have a lot to say and not enough time to do the work right now.

The short answer will be the para-urethral glands and presence of fluid are supported by primary medical research. The phemonenom of high volume squirting is really unclear and skewed by the sources.

It might seem odd, but my posts on this subject and choux's actually agree, though they appear to take different angles. Male ejaculation is a different, unique phenomenon. High volume female "ejaculation" is believed by many clinical sex therapists to likely be urine aided, but there's a lack of primary lit. Making it black and white, not unlike other aspects of human sexuality, especially female.

Going to take a few days to get this done.

I wasn't closing the thread, dear.

I just don't want the "It's urine!" "It's NOT urine" thing to go back and forth.

The thread remains open, but I want to see some sources for both sides of the argument, if it is argued at all.

"Statesman" page 299, Plato

"To think that a thing can go at one time in one direction and at another time in another, is not lawful." No matter if it be urine, cows milk or just plain yogurt.