At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them
answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in
answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you
will be able to:
Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+
topics.
Quick question. I have seen a lot of these threads where people are confused about what constitutes virginity. I was just wondering what most of you thought about oral sex. If you have had oral sex but not intercourse, are you still considered a virgin?
Quick question. I have seen a lot of these threads where people are confused about what constitutes virginity. I was just wondering what most of you thought about oral sex. If you have had oral sex but not intercourse, are you still considered a virgin?
I believe if any of your part touch any of their private parts or vice-versa you aren't a virgin.
Just because you are sucking on it or stuffing it up your butt doesn't let you pretend you are a virgin just because you avoided the remaining hole.
A virgin has not experienced sex....not oral sex, not anal sex, not bestiality, and not even if you were spanking his monkey.
I blame this on the Politically correctness crap.
There is no gray area here. If being a virgin is important to you then abstain from having any form of sex with another. You can't have your cake and eat it too.
I mean, I give people advice about it all the time.
I've examined several people.
I've taught people to have sex.
I've taken a few classes on it.
I just don't have the DEGREE.
But by Smoothy's logic, since I've done everything BUT get the degree, it means I'm a doctor.
You can all call me Dr. Synnen now.
There is a difference there....You might have gone through the school.....but if you didn't take that last exam to get your sheepskin you aren't a Dr. yet.
The standards for different for virgin...
Virgins haven't had sex. If she is a deep throat queen then she isn't a virgin. If she's taken on entire groups of guys anally....she isn't a virgin. Even if she has avoided that one hole.
Contrary to what a certain ex-president claims. Oral sex is still sex.
Lets further extrapolate here. Assume this was your husband. And he's fooling around with this "Virgin". Is it sex if they did everything but Vaginal penetration?
And for you guys assume this is your wife. Would it be considered sex if all she did was perform oral or anal on this other guy?
If it looks like a duck, If it walks like a duck, and if it quacks like a duck, then its a duck
Now I'm stuck, when you mentioned the wife/ husband scenario you had me starting to agree with you. I would definitely consider it cheating if my husband performed oral sex on another women, so I guess I have to agree that it is sex. Like I said earlier, I think we need a new definition of virgin and probably a new one for sex too.
Now I'm stuck, when you mentioned the wife/ husband scenario you had me starting to agree with you. I would definitely consider it cheating if my husband performed oral sex on another women, so I guess I have to agree that it is sex. Like I said earlier, I think we need a new definition of virgin and probably a new one for sex too.
Yea that's where I'm going with it too. If my wife received oral sex from a man then she had sex, but I wouldn't consider it losing her virginity, that's still the old hymen/penetration test in my books.
I wouldn't be mad at him for having "sex" with a virgin. I'd be mad at him for putting someone else between us, whether it's physically or emotionally--virgin or not.
Sex acts are different than sexual intercourse. Even you people trying to define it differently have to admit that.
You lose your virginity when you have sexual intercourse.
Otherwise--where's the line? Do you lose you virginity the first time you kiss someone? How about the first time you hold hands? The first time someone touches your naughty bits through your clothes?
The line is, traditionally, sexual intercourse.
I agree that people should be asking the OTHER questions, though. Finding out how much experience your partner has in general should be a good thing.
I think most people are just defining it as 'being sexual' rather than going into the 'virginity' idea that so out-dated. Being sexual means just that. Touching, licking, penetrating......
Maybe we can get the word virginity removed from the dictionary.
I wouldn't be mad at him for having "sex" with a virgin. I'd be mad at him for putting someone else between us, whether it's physically or emotionally--virgin or not.
Sex acts are different than sexual intercourse. Even you people trying to define it differently have to admit that.
You lose your virginity when you have sexual intercourse.
Otherwise--where's the line? Do you lose you virginity the first time you kiss someone? How about the first time you hold hands? The first time someone touches your naughty bits through your clothes?
The line is, traditionally, sexual intercourse.
I agree that people should be asking the OTHER questions, though. Finding out how much experience your partner has in general should be a good thing.
Darnit, I agree with you too. Guess I'll be Switzerland, neutral.
I wouldn't be mad at him for having "sex" with a virgin. I'd be mad at him for putting someone else between us, whether it's physically or emotionally--virgin or not.
Sex acts are different than sexual intercourse. Even you people trying to define it differently have to admit that.
You lose your virginity when you have sexual intercourse.
Otherwise--where's the line? Do you lose you virginity the first time you kiss someone? How about the first time you hold hands? The first time someone touches your naughty bits through your clothes?
The line is, traditionally, sexual intercourse.
I agree that people should be asking the OTHER questions, though. Finding out how much experience your partner has in general should be a good thing.
Guys can have sex with absolutely no intimacy or feelings for the woman....happens all the time, look what happens to so many women in high school and college when they get sweet talked by some jock with raging hormones with one thing on his mind.
Women for the most part view sex in a different light. Few women have sex with someone they have zero feelings or connection with.
And this whole argument about "is she a virgin or not" if you take a good look is all about people trying to have it both ways.
sexually experienced virgin is an oxymoron. Sex is sex....and being a virgin is abstaining from that. And its something you can never go back to once its gone.
Again--sexual acts are different than sexual intercourse.
I want to know where you draw the line, then, Smoothy. Where is the line that says you can do up to X things with your boyfriend before you aren't a virgin anymore?
It's not people trying to have it both ways--it's people trying to define "virgin" as "pure".
Virgin only means you haven't had intercourse. It says NOTHING about whatever else you may or may not have done.
If that isn't what it means---where is the line? Where do you define how much experience makes you no longer a virgin?
Linear Mode
