At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them
answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in
answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you
will be able to:
Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+
topics.
Circumcision has been practiced for a very long time. It has been said to meet certain religious requirements and to prevent disease. It is an accepted thing. It is preferred by mothers that I have met because it makes it easier to keep the baby's penis clean.
Personally, as a woman, I find that uncircumcised penises feel better during sex. I read that the foreskin is there not only to protect the penis, but is the most sensitive skin on it.
I know there are ongoing studies to ascertain if the foreskin harbors germs and carcinogens, and disease control is a vital concern to many. Does that make it OK to remove an extremely sensitive (in more than one way) body part without the boy's permission?
I have not met any men who were circumcised as adults. So, is there a difference in before and after sensitivity for men? I heard that adult circumcision is extremely painful. Doing it to a baby wouldn't be all that different would it? I would not have someone else's ears pierced without their mature permission and total willingness. Is this different?
So would you want to slap your parents because you aren't endowed with 12" of manhood too? Or if you are a woman because you have A cups and wish they were D cups?
I'm not in the best physical condition and I freely admit that....but I can go an hour or two without passing out from exhaustion.
well YOU ARE stating that you know what women prefer. Its all about personal preference. And you are not being open minded about the subject of circumcision. You are basing everything that a women prefers solely on the fact of being cut or not. There are many other factors that play into the satisfaction of a woman. I mentioned size of penis and physical fitness as examples of that.
well YOU ARE stating that you know what women prefer. Its all about personal preference. And you are not being open minded about the subject of circumcision. You are basing everything that a women prefers solely on the fact of being cut or not. There are many other factors that play into the satisfaction of a woman. I mentioned size of penis and physical fitness as examples of that.
I'm not 18....I haven't lived in one town my entire life...
I've spent years living overseas non-stop....and not counting repeated overseas vacations before and since that.
I've dated women (and slept with them) from roughly 10 different countries, from China, to Europe to South America.
Can you match that much less top it?..... me not being open minded about circumcision? Hell I am circumsized....I'm not the one running around ranting about how "BAD" this supposedly is.
If it was Bad I would most certainly be the one to know this. How many women from how many countries have you been intimate with? And I'm not talking women whose parents or grandparents immigrated here. I'm talking women from other nations that have never even been to the USA.
Penis size and how fit the guy is means didly squat with a womans satisfaction if the guy doesn't know what he is doing.
Wow, when did we go from circumcision to sexual prowess? The fact of the matter is that circumcision is unnecessary in today's world. Whether or not you decide to circumcise your son is always up to you but if you are doing it just because you think it's necessary health wise than I would do some research before the time comes. Everybody has to be happy with what they have. Circumcised men, it's okay, it's not like you're going to grow it back,even if you aren't happy, so learn to live with it and enjoy. Uncircumcised men- you can always cut it off if you want, but why? Learn to live with it and enjoy.
I'd say leave it natural. I've had a circumcision, but, I do hear it's more sensitive without it being trimmed. Even though it's sensitive without the foreskin, if it were more sensitive, then great!!!!
I'd say leave it natural. I've had a circumcision, but, I do hear it's more sensitive without it being trimmed. Even though it's sensitive without the foreskin, if it were more sensitive, then great!!!!
Not for me....I'm happy I'm cut. Its plenty sensitive but if it were more so then I'd be running more sprints and fewer marathons if you catch my drift.
Women aren't into minute men. If you can't last to the end of the race then you might have a mighty frustrated wife.
a person can train themselves to hold back through mental and physical exercises.
im cut and have no complaints. my son is not cut for reasons ive already stated. both circumcised and uncircumcised men have been able to have great sex lives, and then other circumcised or uncircumcised men have lousy sex lives.
i dont think men are born "broken", and i dont think leaving a man uncut dooms him to the life of a "minute man".
a person can train themselves to hold back through mental and physical exercises.
im cut and have no complaints. my son is not cut for reasons ive already stated. both circumcised and uncircumcised men have been able to have great sex lives, and then other circumcised or uncircumcised men have lousy sex lives.
i dont think men are born "broken", and i dont think leaving a man uncut dooms him to the life of a "minute man".
It ain't broken...it works very well, above average in fact.
but sensitivity does relate to lasting power or why else would there be numbing cremes on the market for guys who lack the mental mastery over their body?
True thats only half the battle however...the rest is purely in the guys mind cut or uncut.
It doesn't automatically make an uncut guy a minute man...but it does give the cut guy an advantage on a marathon.
But hey, cut or uncut.....if it still works when you need it to then what does it all really matter anyway.