 | | | Etg testing, non-alcoholic beer and creatine levels
Asked Apr 23, 2011, 12:27 AM
—
17 Answers I have been court ordered to participate in random Etg alcohol testing. During the times in which I was drinking alcohol, my Etg levels were consistently >10,000. I did not realize that "NA" beer might register a positive result on these tests until it happened to me! I have not had an alcoholic beverage (not even a sip) since 2/28/2011. I do drink NA beer on occasion, and 5 of my 12 most recent Etg's (March 3-April 11) have been reported as positive. The Etg levels on 4 of them were 125-254 ng/mL, but one was 728 ng/mL. The tox lab is insisting that NA beer will never result in Etg levels over 500 ng/mL unless you drink "barrels full". Skinner website suggests I check out my creatine levels for this test as concentrated urine can increase Etg up to 15 times the actual level. Is this true? I am furiously attempting to gather documentation that points to NA beer consumption and Etg levels. I am sure that I didn't drink any real beer! Help! Thread Summary |
17 Answers
 | Ultra Member | |
Apr 23, 2011, 06:58 AM
| | | Are you Male or Female? Also age. There are a few studies on non-alcoholic drinks. I will get you some references.
Urine tested positive for ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulphate after the consumption of “non-alcoholic” beer Thierauf, A., etal (2010) investigated non-alcoholic beer and EtG and found it was not uncommon to test in the range of 3.0-8.7. One subject measured 14.1 mg/ml. Hoiseth, G. (2010) investigated non-alcoholic wine. EtG was negative but EtS was positive. Frank Musshoff (2010) cites the phenomenon.
These articles are recent, relevant and appear in peer reviewed journals.
By "Skinner" I assume you are referring to Skipper? He introduced EtG to the US and is known as the leading expert in the field. His acknowledgement of concentrated urine increasing EtG levels is correct. See here
Regardless of the claims of the testing lab there is no known method for assessing dose, amount or type alcohol consumed. That is a guess on their part. | | |  | New Member | |
Apr 26, 2011, 02:13 PM
| | | Thank you for responding to my question Dr. Bill. The answer to you questions is that I am a 45 yr. Old female. I was able to find out my urine creatinine level for the particular test in question - it was 190.5. Could this level have affected my EtG/EtS? I have a court hearing on May2 and am desperately seeking information in my defense of sobriety. How could I go about contacting an expert/toxicologist that would provide me with a written letter defending my claim? Thank you again. | | |  | New Member | |
Apr 26, 2011, 02:18 PM
| | | Comment on DrBill100's post Quote:
Originally Posted by DrBill100 Are you Male or Female? Also age. There are a few studies on non-alcoholic drinks. I will get you some references.
Urine tested positive for ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulphate after the consumption of “non-alcoholic” beer Thierauf, A., etal (2010) investigated non-alcoholic beer and EtG and found it was not uncommon to test in the range of 3.0-8.7. One subject measured 14.1 mg/ml. Hoiseth, G. (2010) investigated non-alcoholic wine. EtG was negative but EtS was positive. Frank Musshoff (2010) cites the phenomenon.
These articles are recent, relevant and appear in peer reviewed journals.
By "Skinner" I assume you are referring to Skipper? He introduced EtG to the US and is known as the leading expert in the field. His acknowledgement of concentrated urine increasing EtG levels is correct. See here
Regardless of the claims of the testing lab there is no known method for assessing dose, amount or type alcohol consumed. That is a guess on their part. | Thank you for responding to my question Dr. Bill. The answer to you questions is that I am a 45 yr. Old female. I was able to find out my urine creatinine level for the particular test in question - it was 190.5. Could this level have affected my EtG/EtS? I have a court hearing on May2 and am desperately seeking information in my defense of sobriety. How could I go about contacting an expert/toxicologist that would provide me with a written letter defending my claim? Thank you again. (sorry I posted in the "answer" area the first time is sent this!) | | |  | Ultra Member | |
Apr 26, 2011, 02:20 PM
| | | Please provide EtG and or EtS reading as it appears on the printout. Creatinine level definitely effects EtG. Additionally, provide the creatinine level as it is printed. On each of the foregoing include the quantity Ex. Ng/L etc. | | |  | New Member | |
Apr 26, 2011, 02:26 PM
| | | Comment on DrBill100's post Quote:
Originally Posted by DrBill100 Please provide EtG and or EtS reading as it appears on the printout. Creatinine level definitely effects EtG. Additionally, provide the creatinine level as it is printed. On each of the foregoing include the quantity Ex. Ng/L etc. | EtG 753 ng/mL; EtS 255 ng/mL | | |  | New Member | |
Apr 26, 2011, 02:31 PM
| | | Comment on DrBill100's post Quote:
Originally Posted by DrBill100 Please provide EtG and or EtS reading as it appears on the printout. Creatinine level definitely effects EtG. Additionally, provide the creatinine level as it is printed. On each of the foregoing include the quantity Ex. Ng/L etc. | Again please, how could I get a written letter from an "expert" or toxicologist supporting your information? Thank you! | | |  | Ultra Member | |
Apr 26, 2011, 03:05 PM
| | | In the study cited above Thierauf, etal "Urine tested positive for ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulphate after the consumption of “non-alcoholic” beer", the range for non-alcoholic beer was between 300-870 ng/ml. (EtG) One subject measured 14100 ng/ml the following day.
This study appeared in Forensic Science International Volume 202, Issues 1-3, 10 October 2010, Pages 82-85. Clearly the laboratory is misinformed. Not unusual.
The relatively low levels reported could be due to urine concentration, yeast infection, improper storage or shipment of the sample or contamination, something you ate, inhaled, or thousands of other causes.
I'm not an expert on the legal issues but I doubt that a court will accept a letter. They usually require expert testimony. If they will accept a letter it would seem likely they would be equally amenable to an article(s) published in recognized journals. Do you have an attorney involved? | | |  | New Member | |
Apr 26, 2011, 05:50 PM
| | | Comment on DrBill100's post Quote:
Originally Posted by DrBill100 In the study cited above Thierauf, etal "Urine tested positive for ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulphate after the consumption of “non-alcoholic” beer", the range for non-alcoholic beer was between 300-870 ng/ml. (EtG) One subject measured 14100 ng/ml the following day.
This study appeared in Forensic Science International Volume 202, Issues 1-3, 10 October 2010, Pages 82-85. Clearly the laboratory is misinformed. Not unusual.
The relatively low levels reported could be due to urine concentration, yeast infection, improper storage or shipment of the sample or contamination, something you ate, inhaled, or thousands of other causes.
I'm not an expert on the legal issues but I doubt that a court will accept a letter. They usually require expert testimony. If they will accept a letter it would seem likely they would be equally amenable to an article(s) published in recognized journals. Do you have an attorney involved? | I do an attorney. Her experience regarding testing is that the Court places weight on the ua information. She believes that what I say or she can argue as "lay" people would not carry significant weight with the Court. I disagree. Without having a lab that will sustantiate my claims re-test the specimen, I doubt that any or their toxicologists would prove a letter in my support. I will share this information with my legal counsel and go from there - I can't thank you enough for your help! | | |  | Junior Member | |
Apr 26, 2011, 07:43 PM
| | | DrBill,
I am going on a vacation in a this weekend to celebrate my 5 year anniversary. I usually don't drink, but this is a celebration. I know I will receive an etg test on the Tuesday I return home. If I allow 100 hours between the test and my last drink, will I pass? Have you heard of anyone, who isn't an alcoholic, failing an etg after the 80 hours? I keep seeing up to 5 days which is 120 hours so I'm worried...(female,5'3,120lbs | | | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | Add your answer here.
Check out some similar questions!
Will I pass an ETG test after drinking one beer [ 7 Answers ]
I drank one beer at 8PM with dinner and thereafter started flushing my system with water after I knew I messed up. I got up and went to the gym for 2 hours. Drank liter after liter of water and green tea. I took vitamin B and C and creatine (sp) to hopefully combat the diluted urine. I pissed...
Etg test, only drank one beer [ 0 Answers ]
I drank one coors light last night around 8 pm, have to take an etg test roughly what is now 16 hours later, what do I have to do to pass the test
Can non-alcoholic beer make you test positive on an ETG test? [ 2 Answers ]
I had 1 non-alcoholic beer 96 hours before and 1 non-alcoholic beer 72 hours before an ETG alcohol test. I weigh 122lbs and am 5 ft 3 in good health. I was applying for a new job and wasn't aware that you had to pass an ETG test. I know there isn't much alcohol in these but heard it can be...
View more Addictions questions Search |
|