Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
Ask    ||    Answer
 
Advanced  
 

Ask QuestionsprogressAnswer QuestionsprogressBuild ReputationprogressBecome an Expert
 
Free Answers in 3 Easy Steps

Register Now
3 Steps

At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you will be able to:
  • Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+ topics.
  • Accept money for answers that you provide.
  • Communicate privately with other members (PM).
  • See fewer ads.

Home > Business & Careers > Accounting   »   Absorption Costing - Opening stock and closing stock query?

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Question
 
 
#1  
Old Apr 7, 2007, 02:27 PM
studentaccount
New Member
studentaccount is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 8
studentaccount See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Absorption Costing - Opening stock and closing stock query?

Hi guys,

I have an absorption costing query on the profit statement, here are the notes:

Selling price per unit = £20
Sales for year 1 = 10,000
Production = 20,000
Production Cost Per Unit = £10

YEAR ONE
Sales (£20 x 10,000) 200,000
Cost Of Sales::

Opening Stock (£10 x 0) 0
Cost of Prod (£10 x 20,000) 200,000
----------
200,000
-C/Stock (£10 x 10,000) (100,000)
-----------
Cost Of Sales (100,000)
GROSS PROFIT 100,000

So in year two the closing stock of 100,000 would be carried forward as opening stock in year 2... but if the production cost per unit was to go to £15. Would i have to value the opening stock as either:

a) £10 x 10,000 = £100,000 like the closing stock from year one
or
b) £15 x 10,000 = £150,000 using the new production cost per unit (becuase i would have to value the closing stock using the £15)

Thanks for your help any replies and views would be much appreciated

Reply With Quote
 
     

Answers
 
 
Old Apr 7, 2007, 11:58 PM   #2  
Ultra Member
CaptainForest is offline
 
CaptainForest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,669
CaptainForest See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.CaptainForest See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.CaptainForest See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.CaptainForest See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
I would go with 10,000 x 10.

Why?

Because these are finished goods. They only cost you 10 to make, not 15.

So what if production costs have risen to 15, apply that 15 to new costing.

Treat this inventory on a FIFO basis.

I wish to talk more about this, but I am too tired too.

Comments on this post
studentaccount agrees: helpful but still doubting myself :( although CaptainForests idea makes sence :S
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Apr 8, 2007, 03:17 AM   #3  
New Member
studentaccount is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 8
studentaccount See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainForest
I would go with 10,000 x 10.

Why?

Because these are finished goods. They only cost you 10 to make, not 15.

So what if production costs have risen to 15, apply that 15 to new costing.

Treat this inventory on a FIFO basis.

I wish to talk more about this, but I am too tired too.

Thank you CaptainForest,

Taken what you have said into account the difference between marginal and absorption costing :

Sales = Production = no difference in Profit (Absorption vs Marginal)
Sales > Production = marginal will yield more profit
Production > sales = Absorption will yield more profit

but in one of my questions if i use the same technique in what u have said in my question, when sales > production the absorption costingyields more profit but it shouldn't do?!
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jun 14, 2009, 11:09 PM   #4  
New Member
chris0298 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 6
chris0298 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
I think this is two seperate issues.

Sales > Production will reduce stock
Using FIFO concept, the closing stock should be 15 (assume stock produced in year 1 all sold)

Sales < Production will increase stock
The stock should have 2 value, 10 and 15. You may use perpatual costing method or weighted average costing method to determine stock value/unit. (Total stock value should be the same)
  Reply With Quote
 
     

Your Answer
Email me when someone replies to my answer
Join Login





Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

 
Similar Sponsors


Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Similar Threads
stock provision and over valuation of stock
(1 replies)
Stock Split and Stock Dividend
(1 replies)
stock dividend/ stock split?
(1 replies)
Stock Dividends and Stock Splits
(0 replies)
Accounting for treasury stock used in stock dividend
(0 replies)

Search this Thread

Advanced Search

Bookmarks

Sponsors



Copyright ©2003 - 2009, Ask Me Help Desk.
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:14 AM.